Do You Remember When People Magazine Said That Rumsfeld Was Sexy?

I do, but I'm hoping it was a bad dream.

Donald Rumsfeld can't coin a phrase as memorable as "nattering nabobs of negativity," but he sure doesn't like bad press. When he can't manage to bribe his way into journalistic favor, he does what today's leading conservatives typically do: he whines like a schoolchild. He whines that no one understands him. That no one's listening to him. And most of all, that it isn't fair.* The latest complaint is about unfavorable (i.e. truthful) accounts of American activities in the international press. Rumsfeld complains that these activities are being:

"reported and spread around the world, often with little context and little scrutiny, let alone correction or accountability after the fact."

U N B E L I E V A B L E. No accountablilty after the fact? Little scrutiny? Gosh, Rummy, that sounds a lot like some yellowcake uranium documents that just happened to provide the specious "justification" for your war. Well, when the justification wasn't that Saddam and Osama are the same guy.

The Niger documents needed exactly this much scrutiny to be proven false: GOOGLE.

They were proven false with google (GOOGLE!?!!), and yet no one in any of the intelligence agencies was capable of disproving them until we were already in the middle of a war. And accountability after the fact? Bush blamed other people for believing them. People to whom he had presented them as reliable intelligence.

Unlike the Straussians, Rumsfeld and Bush haven't intellectualized their program of deceit. They just instinctively believe that what's good for them is good for the country. They have the same stunted moral imagination responsible for supply side economics: "If my golfing buddies and I are better off, this MUST be the right course of action for the nation. Now who wants to get bagged and score some trim?"

*I recently spent about an hour discussing fairness with two delightful six year-olds who were having a reasonably polite argument about how to divide up some stickers. Certain methods of dividing would "be fair to her but not to me," one explained, "and the other would be fair to me and not to her." I (mis)spent a good deal of time trying to explain that "fair" necessarily excludes the dative. There is no "to me" or "for her" in fair. Fair is impartial. The six year-olds didn't quite get it. Neither, apparently, does the administration.