This Blog is Stolen Property

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Maybe He Could Get the Poet Laureate Job

With Alberto Gonzales leaving, Washington gets a little less poetic.

The depth and grace of Gonzales' talent can be heard in how he modulates the cadence of the anaphoric "I do not recall"--a less gifted artist would have been content to let this become merely a catchy refrain. But Gonzales was not afraid to take risks as a poet, employing a subtle variatio, in which "I do not recall" becomes "I can't remember" becomes "I don't know" and returns with renewed forced--in an almost transcendent register--to "I do not recall." It has the rhythmic seductiveness of Gerard Manley Hopkins, coupled with the incisive brevity of early Ezra Pound.

And who can forget his prose poetry? The merest sample is enough to demonstrate its genius:

I am not aware that it certainly was in my mind a problem or basis to accept the recommendation that they be asked to leave.

In "Man Carrying Thing," Wallace Stevens wrote: "The poem must resist the intellegence almost successfully." Stevens, whose often abstruse lyricism is clearly an influence on Gonzales' work, is outstripped by the younger poet, who in this breathtaking passage resists the intelligence with utter success. The student surpasses the master.

But as much as Gonzales' work hearkens back to these poets of High Modernism, one can also see the influence of postmodernism in this creative auteur. One of the hallmarks of postmodernist literature is the transgression of generic boundaries between high and low culture. This embracing of so-called "low" genres can be best seen in Gonzales' work in the plot-heavy Padilla Affair.

Gonzales demonstrates his mastery of the thriller in the exciting last-minute plot twist, in which the prisoner is finally granted a civilian trial just as the story's chief antagonist, the justice system, is about to compel the Administration to adhere to the law of the land. This critic, for one, never saw it coming! A roller-coaster ride of adventure, from the first illegal detainment to the Constitution-defying denouement!

Goodbye, Alberto Gonzales. D.C. was never meant for one as beautiful as you.

5 Comments:

  • You, sir, have earned the slow-clap (and a healthy heaping of my respect) of the day.

    Bravo and well done...

    Benticore
    Out

    By Blogger Benticore, at 12:54 PM  

  • After I moved into my slum apartment in college, one of my neighbors gave me a flea-ridden kitten. I called her Mabel because she was a homely-ass cat.

    Mable had likely been abused by a man at some point in her life because she was always on twitchy alert around me and my roommates. She'd nuzzle the girlfriends, but Mabel was terrified of us boys.

    So what did asshole Dwight do? I aggravated the cat.

    Sitting on the recliner I'd wait until the cat was slinking past my feet and then I'd suddenly drum my feet on the floor.

    Pyeeeewww! Mabel would fire off like a shot. A couple of times she launched herself right into the sliding glass door, cracking her skull. For some awful reason we thought this was funny at the time. Stupid cat, yaknow?

    The cat died that year. We came home and found her dead in the bottom of the coat closet. She wasn't even two. She was just a nervous little cat in a bad environment for nervous little cats.

    So, I ask you? When Mabel ran headlong into the furniture, who was responsible? Mabel for being a high-strung dumbass cat? Or me for bullying her?

    On one level, it's hard to empathize with Alberto's plight. The em-effer lied. He lied like a rug. He lied like a rug when all he had to do was raise his big, Latino middle finger at Ted Kennedy and say, "Eat it, Chappaqua Ted. What part of 'At the pleasure of the president' don't you understand, Chunk? I'm sure you all Senators have no problem overlooking Democratic voter fraud, but guess what? I have a problem with it."

    But did he do that? Nope.

    He spooked. He ran right into the end table at full panic speed.


    See, the thing about hypocrisy is this, Feemus: You can't cure opposing ideologies of their hypocrisies. You just can't. It's impossible. The best you can hope for is to do the best you can to overcome the hypocrisies found in your own ideologies.

    Personally, I try to reconcile firing those attorneys against the way Hills completely ruined the life, career, reputation, and bank account of Billy Dale. All she had to say was "Sorry, Dude, I'm giving your job to my friends from Arkansas. Pack your box." But she didn't. She trumped up charges. Sicced the FBI on him. Billy had his day in court, was exonerated, and the Judge had some harsh words for Hills, but that never made the news.

    I can't go there any more. Hills is Hills. Her hypocrisy belongs to her. If libs want to look past Hills and call for Alberto's scalp, that's on them.

    I'm too busy reconciling the hypocrisy in the Libertarian positions. There are plenty of those and I'll readily cop to them.

    Given the "gotcha game" going on in D.C., I'll be happy to make it to 2008 without My Beautiful Wife finding me curled up in an old shoe with my tongue hanging out.

    By Blogger Dwight's Writing Manifesto, at 10:27 AM  

  • Gonzales is Mabel, right? Who is Dwight in this analogy?

    Is Ted Kennedy?

    I had a blind cat once. She was very cool, just sort of mellow and cheerful. She never ran into anything, even if I moved the furniture, so she must've been able to see a little bit. But it took her like five minutes to jump up on anything, even if she'd jumped on it a thousand times before.

    Her name was Hobie. No analogy. She died of kidney failure when she was thirteen. Very nice cat.

    But seriously--it's not that I want to cure ideological hypocrisy (as you rightly point out, I have plenty of the homegrown kind to worry about) so much as I want my civil rights back. And I will not be convinced that I shouldn't be pissed off about Gonzales because of Travelgate. Travelgate doesn't weaken my conviction that we need to stop illegal wiretaps and need to reinstate habeas corpus.

    That's like saying that because Lizzie Borden killed people, we shouldn't get upset when Ted Bundy does. I have plenty of mad in me to be mad at Clinton and Gonzales.

    And as corrupt and cronyist and altogether icky as the Travel Office abuses were, they didn't damage the country in the same way. For that matter, neither did Watergate. As distasteful as Watergate was, it didn't really injure the body politic in any significant way. Like Travelgate, it was largely a crime against individuals, not against the nation. And yet Nixon was forced to resign to reaffirm the principle that no one is above the law, not even (or especially not) it's chief executor. I think this is a really good principle.

    By Blogger Feemus, at 7:18 AM  

  • You are absolutely correct, Sir. Bad behavior is never an excuse for more bad behavior. Never.

    World without end, Amen.

    Now, more to your point about Gonzalas as the personification point for the loss of your personal liberties.

    He is. Bush is. Blair was.

    This administration is, without question, eroding your freedoms.

    Now...

    Here's the ugly part...

    Seriously...

    There is only one known effective defense against Terrorism. And that, my friend, is Fascism.

    There are certain culture petri dishes around this globe where Fascism is the only thing keeping the Terrorists in check.

    You can debate how we came to be one of said petri dishes. You can point whatever fingers at whomever if it makes you feel better and undoubtedly you'd probably be right in many instances.

    But this is where we are now. Not just in Iraq, but at home. The U.S. has become a petri dish for terrorism.

    The only effective stringent history has shown us is Fascism.

    Man, I can't tell you how much that pisses off this Libertarian.

    But then I look at the Brits with their Big Brother spy camera everywhere, and they're the ones catching the bad guys. They're the ones breaking up cells. I'm forced to admit... Fascism has a function.

    Grrr-r-r-r!

    There are two futures for this country: Islamic state under Sharea law, or Fascist Big Brother Orwellian state.

    And this, Scarecrow, is what makes me want to direct my vengeful anger at the Islamoterrorists. For forcing us into a position where we have to change "who we are" to avoid becoming "who they want us to be."

    GOP Fearmongering? Have I drank the Kool-aid?

    We'll see. I'll ask the Twelfth Imam when I see him.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:30 AM  

  • Well, I don't think we'll ever agree on that. For one thing, I don't think that totalitarian regimes are particularly stable. Even the Stasi couldn't keep it together for more than a few decades, and they were just policing a country about the size of South Dakota where most everyone spoke the same language. Sure, they were effective for a while, and they even did some good (I think they rescued some leftists from Pinochet). But you just can't have a stable government with that level of surveillance and repression.

    But...I still don't know who analogy-Dwight is. Sigh.

    By Blogger Feemus, at 8:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home